John Carpenter Hints at 'The Thing' Identity, Fan Solves Mystery

The allure of John Carpenter's iconic 1982 sci-fi horror film, *The Thing*, lies in its enigmatic ending, which has puzzled fans for 43 years. The debate centers on whether R.J. MacReady, portrayed by Kurt Russell, or Childs, played by Keith David, morphs into the film's titular monster. Carpenter deliberately crafted an ambiguous conclusion, offering no clear answers—until a recent revelation at a special 4K screening at the David Geffen Theater in Los Angeles on March 22. In conversation with acclaimed director Bong Joon Ho, Carpenter hinted at a "giant hint" embedded within the movie that could unveil the true identity of The Thing by the film's end. In a playful twist, Carpenter suggested that the secret could be his for a price, jesting that anyone interested should send an unspecified amount of money "in an envelope to my house."

Carpenter also disclosed that the actors were kept in the dark about their characters' fates. "They had no clue," he confessed. "But they had to play it human, you see. The creature imitates perfectly. It could be one of us, it could be somebody in the audience, and there’s no way of telling. So I knew, they didn’t know."

Following the screening, indie director Joe Russo (not to be confused with the MCU's Joe Russo) took to X / Twitter to share his theory on the hinted clue. Russo pointed out that MacReady learns the creature can replicate at the cellular level, advising that only food and drink they've personally handled should be consumed. Yet, MacReady shares his liquor with Childs in the film's closing moments. Russo interprets this as a sign that MacReady may have already turned into The Thing, suggesting that MacReady's oversight was deliberate. "As soon as Childs drinks from the bottle, The Thing has won," Russo posits. "It’s beaten its most skeptical, final threat."

The genius of Carpenter's film is that it leaves these theories unconfirmed. Russo further bolstered his argument by analyzing the film's final line, "Why don't we just wait here for a little while, see what happens?" suggesting it aligns with MacReady's transformation. He also questioned whether the scene of MacReady killing The Thing was a genuine victory or a clever imitation outmaneuvering a lesser one to better infiltrate society upon rescue.

The 25 Best Horror Movies

26 Images

Russo's theory has stirred debate among fans. Some lean towards the notion that Childs is The Thing, citing his unexplained absence before the final scene. A fan remarked, "I still think it’s Childs because we don’t know his whereabouts for a long time heading into the final scene. But Keith David will tell you he’s 100% not The Thing." Russo responded, "Carpenter said both actors don't know... Childs always felt like a red herring to me."

Regardless of where one stands on this theory, Carpenter's ability to keep fans engaged and theorizing decades later is a testament to his storytelling prowess. His ongoing insights continue to enrich the legacy of *The Thing*.